Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (190947)	6/19/2004 2:43:31 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573794

> Why bring up irrelevent items. They're not irrelevant. The point is Clinton's power had the effect of an intoxicant, just like the mentioned substances. Yes, they are irrelevant because it didn't matter whether Clinton was president or not. He has charisma and every woman in this country felt it. People who have charisma get laid a lot whether they are president or not. >> two years ago he said Clinton raped her......without drugs. Not exactly. I simply stated some would consider it tantamount to rape. We know the guy is a rapist. I've also said I don't believe he should have been criminally liable in the Lewinsky affair. I defended you earlier this week and said you were not a liar, and how do you repay me? You turn around and lie. Roughly, three years ago, you said Clinton raped her on this very thread. I know you said that because I was shocked. At that time.....three years ago......people like you were shocking to me. I couldn't believe you actually believe that. In any case, you said it and you need to cop to it without any of this "tantamount" $h*t. But he did have a very serious duty to uphold and allowed his pecker to get the best of him.