Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (138272)	6/29/2004 9:48:59 AM
From: Sun Tzu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

So all this foolishness in our laws making a difference between murder one, manslaughter, and negligent homicide should be abolished? That's what you're saying. Really?! That is what I am saying? Now who is twisting the words here? If "intent" was all that you make it out to be, we'd execute for murder one and let everyone else go free. Why have a punishment for "grave indifference to human life" or "manslaughter" if the guy didn't mean to do it? You actually make a better case for me. Given that no connection between 9/11 and Iraq has been found as well as no WMDs, "innocent" Neocons should be charged with manslaughter of Iraqi civilians. The rest of them should be charged with "felony murder". thanks for the tip :-) And please spare me the rhetoric about how most Iraqis wanted us there. I am still waiting for the dancing Iraqis in the streets who are showering our troops with flowers and giving them candies. ST