SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (192371)6/29/2004 1:49:47 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577123
 
Yes, Kerry will be much more affective and smart than Bush has been on foreign and military/counter-terrorism affairs. He will also not have the enormous personal conflict of interest Bush has with his long-standing financial ties to the Saudis and Bin Lauden family.

There is nothing wrong with Kerry stating he wanted to make sure Saddam was disarmed. As he clearly explained, however, there was always a right way to do it and a wrong way to do it. Going in alone without a post-invasion plan, local allies and UN support was just plain reckless, and Kerry stated thatb from the beginning. Too bad Bush didn't listen huh? Bush either got the wrong advice, intentionally deceived us or is just plain inept. Take your pick.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (192371)6/29/2004 2:52:27 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577123
 
Ten,

re: Don't forget Kerry 1.5, who said back in 1998 that America ought to have disarmed Saddam unilaterally.

Is that what Kerry said, or is that the Ten revision 2.3 version?

John