Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (192438)	6/29/2004 7:14:33 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1586534

AS, Kerry has NEVER suggested unilateral invasion and occupation of Iraq under any circumstances. #reply-20265571 Appearing on CNN’s “Crossfire”, on Nov. 12, 1997, the great internationalist even declared that the same UN approval he now preaches for on campaign stops wouldn’t be necessary for then-President Bill Clinton to launch an offensive against Saddam’s regime. “The administration is making it clear they don't even need the UN security council to sign off on a material breach...so furthermore, I think the United States has always reserved the right and will reserve the right to act in its best interests.” He went on to criticize Germany, France, and Russia, asking where their “backbone” was in standing against Hussein. There you have it. Kerry 1.5 said that America reserves the right to ACT in its best interests. If that doesn't suggest invasion, then the word of Kerry 1.5 means squat, and your attempts to cover for him are rather pathetic. Of course, this is the new Kerry 2.0, so we should only pay attention to what he says, right? Too bad Kerry 2.1 won't be bound by anything 2.0 said. Want to keep up this game or do you say "uncle"? Sorry, I'd be embarassed to have you as my "uncle." LOL! Tenchusatsu