Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Michael Moore Is a Big Fat Idiot -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (824)	7/3/2004 4:33:56 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1409

Rightwingers are defending Bush reading "My Pet Goat" during the WTC attacks. According to Anne Corrigan for instance, she's glad he was reading to children and should have sat there for another hour reading to them while the WTC's burned and thousands died. It just amazes be that the rightwing is willing to accept any and all negliigence, corruption and dishonesty from GW Bush. This is why they have no conscience about lying I guess. They have made the leap of faith. GW is great no matter what. And therefore, Kerry must be a traitorous evil enemy. Bunch of brainwashed idiots, don't you think? Fortunately moore's film may cure some of them, A dose of reality they cannot deny.

To: E who wrote (824)	7/3/2004 4:42:25 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1409

Typical Bush lie repeated today: Notice below GW never tells the truth, that Kerry is also for tax cuts and only wants the rich to pay a bit more. So the true statement for Bush would have been to say "Our first responsibility is to wealthy American families". But of course he makes it sound like Kerry will raise average peoples' taxes. Such a bald-faced deceiver. "Our first responsibility is not to raise taxes on hardworking Americans," he said. "All of the tax relief we have passed should be made permanent, so families can continue to keep more of what they earn and businesses can plan for the future with confidence." * By the way, will Bush ever tell us who's going to pay for his deficits? Is he talking permanent deficits, slashed government services and a further devalued dollar in exchange for the illusion that people are better off? ___

To: E who wrote (824)	7/5/2004 6:08:11 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1409

...Treasury economists, for example, had no opportunity to double-check the president's numbers and therefore couldn't purge a disingenuous understatement of the amount of redeemable U.S. debt--a $700 billion understatement that conveniently made the president's large tax cut seem less fiscally onerous. ... ...Treasury economists, for example, had no opportunity to double-check the president's numbers and therefore couldn't purge a disingenuous understatement of the amount of redeemable U.S. debt--a $700 billion understatement that conveniently made the president's large tax cut seem less fiscally onerous. ... So disingenuous that you had to put it in there twice? LOL! "Disingenuous" is such an objective term, don't you think...?