Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (53344)	7/8/2004 1:43:26 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793750

I don't know, karen. Every time I cite you an example which seems to me clearly over the top, Jewish names picked out, slur practically shouted out, you come back with some hypothetical example well within bounds, no slur necessary. It is one thing to say, "it is in the interests of the United States to safeguard democracies in the Middle East, and the US will suffer if it throws Israel to the wolves". It is quite another to say, "the United States must safeguard Israel no matter what it costs the United States. In fact, to hell with the United States, just so long as Israel survives!" It is especially different if the person saying it is an official of an American government, duty-bound to put America's interests first. If you don't get the difference by now I don't think I can explain it to you.