Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GST who wrote (139610)	7/9/2004 4:39:51 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

The issue was not whether they did the same thing, evidently they did not. The issue was whether they agreed that there was a serious threat from Iraq, that we had to do something about it, and that there were compelling reasons to topple Saddam. I brought it up in the context of protesting those who pretend that the Bush administration and/or "neocons" invented the threat for their own nefarious purposes. Furthermore, Clinton has affirmed that in the wake of 9/11 and given the direction of intelligence assessments, he would have pushed for invasion.