SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sea_biscuit who wrote (589954)7/12/2004 3:53:39 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
I supported the action. I was critical of some of the handling of it. My position, in fact, was that the Administration should have acted sooner in both Bosnia and Kosovo.

I finally found some material:

Message 9187129

...By the way, one of the reasons that I dislike the antis on the thread is the ease with which they assume that persons in positions of responsibility are moral cretins. Some may be, and I have no love for Clinton, but most people in responsibility have a sense of the consequences of their actions, and feel the weight of choice heavily. Few people send young men into battle lightly. I supported the Gulf War, and I felt the seriousness of that support, and felt terrible for the fodder that Hussein sent to the front, as well as for our own. How much more so someone who must give the order to go? It may come easily to the others to believe that all of those in positions of responsibility in NATO are complicit in a cynical exercise designed for "muscle flexing", but it does not come easily to me....

Message 9203565

1. The United Nations had the opportunity to condemn the action, but did not take it. Therefore, it has implicitly sanctioned the action.
2. I will not repeat...
3. If the situation were as I said, we picked the right side.
4. Italy was an ally during World War One, and that did not prevent us from invading in altered circumstances.
5. I agree with point five.
For the other set:
1. As I've said, they were massing for such an action anyway, and after Bosnia we had reason to expect a humanitarian catastrophe.
2. I agree that we botched things with the Russians.
3. I tried, in my points, to outline the reasons for NATO to intervene, and therefore why this was not a "blank check" on intervention. I will refer you back to that post.
4. The cost is fairly modest, as these things go, and it all depends on whether or not it is a justified intervention. If so, the cost is no great matter.