Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Earl who wrote (7254)	7/13/2004 10:06:00 AM
From: sea_urchin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

Don > The buck still stops at the top. Indeed. But the problem I have is to identify the top. Sure, W is, to all intents and purposes, the top -- but is he, in fact? Or is he merely the figurehead for the American people. The president, simply because there is one. When one reads through some of that Zackheim stuff, for example this, allamericanpatriots.com ...one immediately becomes impressed with the complexity and ramifications of the "military-industrial-administrative-academic-etc" complex. In fact, as you suggest, it is hard to imagine that Zackheim could have, and on his own, been the "Mastermind". His CV shows he was incredibly busy with his career in the "m-i-a-a complex", even to the point of obsession. He is certainly very able and, indeed, merit-worthy and, without doubt, one of the "central" neocons. But, in the midst of all his other responsibilities, to have found the time to organize an operation as complex as 9/11, I very much have my doubts. In my opinion, operations such as 9/11 have to be planned and executed by a special and highly secret group which is dedicated to the purpose. In fact, from what I have read, it would seem 9/11 must have taken years in planning. It was definitely not something that could have been done on the spur of the moment or even planned and controlled from a cave in Afghanistan, for that matter. That's why I have a feeling it could have even have been "on the books" for some time before W became president. But, as I say above, the question is, "Whose books?"

To: Don Earl who wrote (7254)	7/13/2004 3:51:24 PM
From: Sidney Reilly	Respond to of 20039

Who said remote controlling the 9-11 planes was not possible? Here's a system that can do it. "He was (is?) Corporate VP1 at System Planning Corporation, a major player in the "Homeland Security" industry. One of the products that SysPlan sells is the Command Transmitter Systems, a remote control system for planes, boats, missiles and other vehicles2 . It's highly customable and configurable to interface with an almost limitless number of vehicle types. The remote control theory of 9/11 looks a little better every day. Command Transmitter System System Planning Corproation's Command Transmitter Systems (CTS) provide remote control and flight termination functions through a fully-redundant self-contained solid-state system." aor.cat4.net "Also, System Planning Corporation markets the technology to take over the controls of an airborne vehicle already in flight. For example, the Flight Termination System technology could hijack hijackers and bring the plane down safely. The Flight Termination System can be used in conjunction with the CTS technology that can control up to 8 airborne vehicles simultaneously" thetruthseeker.co.uk That's my theory and it's easily doable. A knock out gas is released in the cockpit behind the locked door and the plane is remotely flown into the towers. They could even knock out everyone on the plane if they wanted to. I don't know if it was ever proven that people actually made cell calls from the planes or not.