Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (194342)	7/15/2004 7:36:08 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574854

You said - "Don't we have certain requirements to fulfill under the NATO alliance? Are you suggesting fulfilling those requirements is tantamount to undertaking a pre emptive war like in Iraq." Message 20275264 and "You'll have to discuss it with NATO. They claim they are committed to defending members from aggression or the threat of aggression..." Message 20292988 I then asked what member of Nato was threatened with armed aggression from Serbia. The answer is no member was. That doesn't mean that the NATO intervention was not justified (or that it was) it just means that that the US was not obligated to participate in the operation. We where not "fulfilling our NATO obligation". Tim