Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (591443)	7/16/2004 12:16:11 PM
From: Bob	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Call me Kreskin! LOL! I said "Say something to excuse it now," and you did. Call you a lunatic, I excused nothing.

To: E who wrote (591443)	7/16/2004 12:18:26 PM
From: Augustus Gloop	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

This is a dumb debate Chelsea is a nice Gal and she has a good personality She really is a nice Gal

To: E who wrote (591443)	7/16/2004 2:00:11 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

You have comprehension deficit disorder. ms kerry's dress was transparent in many natural conditions of expected lighting. It was transparent wherever the dress was close to or laying against the skin. One can take a piece of wax paper and see the exact effect. The flash simply captured what one would see in daylight. Image capture phototechnology does not come close to the human eye in the ability to distinguish a wide dynamic range in a scene. That dress would be far more transparent to the human eye than a photo would show. To conclude ms kerry's who is in the movie making business would not understand lighting or the optical properties of that dress material is amusing.