SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sea_biscuit who wrote (54933)7/18/2004 6:24:39 PM
From: DavesM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793738
 
Then why did you state that the United States should have sent 140,000 troops to Afghanistan. And why did you say that the United States could supply those troops the same way we supply the troops in Iraq?

re: "As I have said elsewhere, I am more familiar with that part of the world than most warmongers here. I do know that Afghanistan has been the graveyard for even the mighty British during the 19th century (care to know how many of the tens of thousands of British soldiers came back from the 1840's invasion of Afghanistan? Two! -- not two thousand. Just two soldiers!) "



To: sea_biscuit who wrote (54933)7/19/2004 1:56:16 AM
From: bela_ghoulashi  Respond to of 793738
 
It's just like I've always said:

Those who know history are doomed to constantly repeat it.

No matter how pointless, outdated, or irrelevant it may be.