Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (140952)	7/20/2004 7:04:30 AM
From: dumbmoney	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

However, the programs did exist for a long time, and trucks of something were sent to Syria in 2003, and Syria ain't telling. Crackpot theories are a dime a dozen. Prove it.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (140952)	7/20/2004 8:58:50 AM
From: John Soileau	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

<<You present these WMD statements as if they a) were false, b) were known to be false at the time, c) were not even plausible.>> Total BS! Mop your brow, and when you calm down, find ANY such assertion in my post. I PRESENTED the statements themselves. I did so to refute CB's assertion in her post, as follows: <<neither Bush nor Blair claimed that Iraq posed a "clear, present and imminent threat on the basis of existing weapons of mass destruction.">> Reciting the verbatim quotes was necessary to make the case that CB's assertion was incorrect. It's called a point. I think you missed it. John