Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Discuss the candidates honestly. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SiouxPal who wrote (1984)	7/21/2004 6:23:15 AM
From: John Carragher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4965

I doubt he is covering up anything. this has all been covered for several years. I think we should talk about current events and what kerry and bush are planning to do in the next four years. not talk about vietnam or getting drunk in maine thirty years ago. They were kids back then. If folks are interested in the candidates why are they not discussing what they will accomplish for the country during the next term. talking about rumor doesn't get to the meat of the election. imo for example does Bush plan to drop a bomb on Iran nuke plants? What does Kerry plan to do with Iran if they continue and start making nukes?

To: SiouxPal who wrote (1984)	7/21/2004 4:53:09 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 4965

The documents clearing Bush on the Harken matter are public. I posted them myself long ago. Cheney's energy meeting is an issue of Executive Privilege. That's also public. The alleged "outing" of Plame is under investigaiton and supposedly indicted are imminent so that statement is also wrong. There is absolutely no truth to the assertion that Bush destroyed his Guard records. That is a flat out lie. Bush initially opposed the 9/11 panel because he felt that the timing was not appropriate for fingerpointing and political grandstanding but to his credit later reversed himself .....as it stands his original decision was probably wiser given the partisan grandstanding from some commission members..... Since there is a war on I expect the President to be rather "secretive"....its perfectly consistent with prosecuting a successful war effort....as far as being the "most secretive"...that sounds like a silly Bush hating moronism.... As usual, you pinheads have no substance just bile...... J.