Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (55698)	7/22/2004 12:16:01 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793607

While I think Clinton wants Kerry to lose, I think he is really trying to help Berger, who after all was his guy. Since Berger was caught red handed, there isn't really any other defense than to pass it off as trivial and worthy of jest. By all means keep attention off exactly which documents have gone missing and why.

To: carranza2 who wrote (55698)	7/22/2004 6:52:31 PM
From: KLP	Respond to of 793607

Dick Morris was on Hannity's radio show today, and said much the same thing. I've voiced my guess here a couple times re: who "spilled the beans about Berger", and this note from Morris seems to make that guess have a bit more traction IMO... The increasing tendency of the Kennedy-Kerry operatives to shut out the Clintons from the campaign highlights the Clinton conundrum: They desperately want Kerry to lose, but can't say so in public. My guess is that Hillary's people leaked the info re Berger (at Hillary's direction).... It's a win-win for her....Kerry looks bad for having a person who breaks the law on his campaign team, and Hillary can help light the wires to encouage the media to speculate that "It MUST have been the Republicans" who leaked it..... I think the NYT already took the rat bait - DeaCon...