Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dr. Id who wrote (141229)	7/22/2004 12:51:20 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

You are obviously having difficulty with the rules of warfare. War leads inevitably to dead people. How you kill them is ruled by a set of laws accepted by the international community. These rules allow the use of napalm, subject to certain conditions which I am positive you have not bothered to research since you appear to be ruled more by emotions than by things you've learned through study, viz., your discussion of LeMay and McNamara into an argument dealing with the use of napalm in Iraq. If you don't believe in war, your point is a good one. Otherwise, more silliness. And if Saddam used "not allowed" weapons, are we culpable at all in manufacturing and selling them? Your comparison of Saddam to us is pathetic; we are not equivalents. You might recall that he used chemical weapons on his own civilian population. And, no, I don't really care what happened 50 years ago. It's irrelevant to the present discussion.