Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (141657)	7/27/2004 3:49:33 PM
From: Win Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Funny. I backed up the thread to where you came in, and came up with this: C'mon, Win, how about something substantive about Okrent's editorial, instead of the same old tired and tiresome stuff? #reply-20350200 But Okrent's editorial had nothing to do with foreign affairs, or the NYT coverage of foreign affairs either. Now, who's twisting things around to fit their own personal Wilson / Berger obsession? Not me, not the NYT, not Okrent. Then there was this: In general, I don't read the NYT editorial page or the op-eds. Interesting. On what basis do you defend it, then? Would you care to point out where, exactly, I defended the NYT editorial page? You came up with a bunch of posts where I noted the eternal NYT vendetta here, but under conventional logic that's not exactly the same thing. Meanwhile, if you want to continue the alleged Okrent discussion, there's always nytimes.com . I'm not holding my breath.