Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (38615)	7/29/2004 10:37:28 AM
From: zonder	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 81568

The only stain Clinton left was on a certain blue dress :-) All Americans, not just Democrats, should be shamed by the stain he left on the presidency

To: Bill who wrote (38615)	7/29/2004 10:41:14 AM
From: Orcastraiter	Respond to of 81568

What about the stains left by the other previous presidents? Many of them had trysts in the White house...some are well known. But not until Clinton did the republican party make a sport out of getting him...for sex. With out a doubt the republican attack was politically motivated. It left our country vulnerable. That is a high price we all pay when such tactics are brought into play. Would have been far better for the country to have just left that whole Monica mess alone. I'm not pardoning Clinton for being a dufus, but I'm not pardoning the republicans for the relentless attack either. Both actions were irresponsible and damaged our country. Orca

To: Bill who wrote (38615)	7/29/2004 10:42:22 AM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 81568

All Americans, not just Democrats, should be shamed by the stain he left on the presidency. But they are not. Don't you remember the impeachment votes in the house. Why did the lawmakers blink? The power and pressure from their constituents is what caused them to do so. People like and continue to love Clinton and it is a forgone conclusion that he would have beaten this "son of a Bush" handily if the constitution permitted him to run for a third time. The father has better credentials than the son. People said that in spite of those credentials, he did not deserve a second term. You think that they would vote junior with worse off credentials? Like father like son, four years and he is done.