SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Devil's Advocate who wrote (38686)7/29/2004 2:17:44 PM
From: Rock_njRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 81568
 
Two Republican dirty tricks to watch out for before the November election:

1. Osama Bin Laden is pulled out of hiding a week before the election. Some on the left are suspicious, but it doesn't matter, because the American people are overjoyed, Bush gains 5% in the polls, just enough to put him over the top. FYI, the Republicans have put a lot of pressure on the Pakistanis to find OBL in the next few months.

2. A "terrorist attack" occurs shortly before the election, which either causes the election to be cancelled or causes people to rally around the President. In a time of uncertainty, people pull the lever for Bush and he wins.

The Republicans are well accoustomed to pulling off just such dirty tricks to win Presidential elections.

1968 - Richard Nixon interferred with the Johnson Admin peace negotiations with the Viet Namese, to prevent a pre-election peace settlement and a boost for the Democratic ticket.

1980 - The Reagan campaign seals a secret deal with the Iranians to keep the American hostages in captivity until after Ronald Reagan is innaugurated (a very symbolic show of Republican strength). The secret deal prevented Jimmy Carter from securing the hostages release (he was actively talking to the Iranians), and gaining an "October Surprise" surge at the polls in Nov, 1980.

1988 - George Bush, Sr. launches a blistering attack against his opponent Michael S. Dukakis, unprecedented in American history.

2000 - George Bush, Jr. and his brother do all they can to ensure that Florida falls into the Republican column. Their tactics include using suspect voter purge lists to wipe tens of thousands of people suppossedly convicted of felonies from the voter rolls (many minorities assumed to be likely to vote for Gore). The problem was that a lot of the people who were purged as a result of the list, weren't convicted felons or were from out of state and shouldn't have had their voter registrations invalidated. A dirty trick that obviously worked brilliantly.

Look for more Dirty Tricks in 2004.



To: Devil's Advocate who wrote (38686)7/29/2004 2:57:48 PM
From: SkywatcherRespond to of 81568
 
Whistle-Blowing Said to Be Factor in F.B.I. Firing
By Eric Lichtblau
New York Times

Thursday 29 July 2004

Washington - A classified Justice Department investigation has concluded that a former F.B.I.
translator at the center of a growing controversy was dismissed in part because she accused the
bureau of ineptitude, and it found that the F.B.I. did not aggressively investigate her claims of
espionage against a co-worker.

The Justice Department's inspector general concluded that the allegations by the translator, Sibel
Edmonds, "were at least a contributing factor in why the F.B.I. terminated her services," and the F.B.I.
is considering disciplinary action against some employees as a result, Robert S. Mueller III, director of
the bureau, said in a letter last week to lawmakers. A copy of the letter was obtained by The New York
Times.

Ms. Edmonds worked as a contract linguist for the F.B.I. for about six months, translating material
in Turkish, Persian and Azerbaijani. She was dismissed in 2002 after she complained repeatedly that
bureau linguists had produced slipshod and incomplete translations of important terrorism intelligence
before and after the Sept. 11 attacks. She also accused a fellow Turkish linguist in the bureau's
Washington field office of blocking the translation of material involving acquaintances who had come
under F.B.I. suspicion and said the bureau had allowed diplomatic sensitivities with other nations to
impede the translation of important terrorism intelligence.

The Edmonds case has proved to be a growing concern to the F.B.I. because it touches on three
potential vulnerabilities for the bureau: its ability to translate sensitive counterterrorism material, its
treatment of internal "whistle-blowers," and its classification of sensitive material that critics say could
be embarrassing to the bureau.

The Justice Department has imposed an unusually broad veil of secrecy on the Edmonds case,
declaring details of her case to be a matter of "state secrets." The department has blocked her from
testifying in a lawsuit brought by families of Sept. 11 victims, it has retroactively classified briefings
Congressional officials were given in 2002, and it has classified the inspector general's entire report on
its investigation into her case. As a result, groups promoting government openness have accused the
Justice Department of abusing the federal procedures in place for classifying sensitive material.

Mr. Mueller's letter, sent July 21 to leading members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, offered a
rare glimpse inside the F.B.I.'s thinking on the case, and its content surprised some congressional
officials.

Given the tight secrecy surrounding the case, "one could argue that Mueller himself disclosed
classified material" by quoting from a still-secret Justice Department report, said one congressional
official who spoke on condition of anonymity.

In his letter, Mr. Mueller said he was pleased that the office of the inspector general "had not
concluded that the F.B.I. retaliated against Ms. Edmonds when it terminated her services on April 2,
2002." At the same time, he said, "I was concerned by the O.I.G.'s conclusion that Ms. Edmonds'
allegations 'were at least a contributing factor in why the F.B.I. terminated her services.' "

He said the F.B.I. would work with the inspector general to determine whether any employees
should be disciplined as a result. And he emphasized that he wanted to encourage all F.B.I.
employees to "raise good faith concerns about mismanagement or misconduct" without fear of
reprisals or intimidation.

The letter did not say what other factors, if any, beyond Ms. Edmonds's accusations may have
played a part in the decision to dismiss her. In the past, federal officials have suggested that her
allegations had nothing to do with her dismissal, pointing instead to what they described as her
"disruptive" presence in the field office.

The inspector general "also criticized the F.B.I.'s failure to adequately pursue Ms. Edmonds's
allegations of espionage as they related to one of her colleagues," Mr. Mueller said in his letter.

In that case, Ms. Edmonds accused a fellow Turkish linguist at the F.B.I. of failing to disclose her
previous contacts with members of an overseas group who became the subject of an intelligence
investigation and of blocking the translation of material as "not pertinent."

Mr. Mueller said that the F.B.I.'s prior review of the case did not corroborate Ms. Edmonds's
allegations. Nor was anyone charged as a result of the espionage investigation. But Mr. Mueller said
that given the inspector general's concerns that the case was not adequately investigated, the F.B.I.
plans to revisit the case and "conduct additional investigation as appropriate."

Officials at the F.B.I. and the inspector general's office declined comment on the Edmonds case
Wednesday, saying the review remains classified.

An official with knowledge of the report who spoke on condition of anonymity said investigators
confirmed some of Ms. Edmonds's allegations about translation problems to be true, but could not
corroborate others because of a lack of evidence. None of her accusations were disproved, the official
said.

Ms. Edmonds said in an interview Wednesday that she had not been informed about any of the
inspector general's findings and was planning a lawsuit to force the public release of the report.

She said was gratified to hear that the inspector general found that her allegations played a part in
her dismissal, and she said public pressure was needed to correct what she considers continuing
problems in the F.B.I.'s ability to translate terrorism intelligence.

"Here we are almost three years after Sept. 11, and these problems have not been corrected," she
said. "This is one of the major problems the intelligence community is facing."

F.B.I. officials say that while they are continuing to seek more linguists, particularly in Arabic, Farsi
and other languages critical to terrorism investigations, they believe they have already made strong
inroads in correcting translation problems.

According to data supplied to Congress, the F.B.I tripled the number of Arabic language specialists
and contract linguists on staff from Sept. 11, 2001, to this March, with the number rising to 209 from
70. Overall, the number of linguists rose to 1,227 from 784, the bureau said.

-------



To: Devil's Advocate who wrote (38686)7/29/2004 3:55:16 PM
From: Rock_njRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
Republican dirty tricks undermined Al Gore and are now slandering John Kerry. Will Republican lies and distortions give Bush another “victory”?
By Frederick Sweet

A Republican dirty tricks campaign last February to embarrass the Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry backfired when it came out that a widely circulated photograph had been faked. Still, the political effect was real.

Republicans falsely credited to the Associated Press a photo making Kerry appear to share a stage with “Hanoi Jane” at a 1970s anti-Vietnam war rally. Without checking the facts, the mainstream media simply ran the Fonda-Kerry story and the Republican dirty trick was disseminated throughout the country.

“There are going to be a lot of dirty tricks in the [presidential] campaign,” said John Hurley, the Kerry campaign’s organizer of military veterans.

Do you recall the flap about Naomi Wolf telling Al Gore to wear “earth tones?” The media frenzy about Gore “inventing the Internet?” Gore claiming to have inspired the movie Love Story? Gore “discovering” Love Canal?

All of those lies were invented by the dirty tricks division of the Republican National Committee and came out of its “attack faxes.” From the fax machine these fabrications went directly and uncritically into print and were broadcast on mainstream radio and television as facts. These were not paid political commercials, but made-up stories that were printed and broadcast as “news” to a trusting public. And when these “news” stories were disseminated, they were more persuasive than any political commercial.

Republican dirty tricks helped by media complicity let George W. Bush steal the election from Al Gore in 2000. Data from the journalism resource service, Nexus-Lexus, strongly suggest that if the mainstream media had covered George Bush’s actual lies with the same frequency and depth that they carried the RNC lies manufactured to discredit Al Gore, then Gore would have won by a landslide. Never underestimate the power of Republican dirty tricks.

Remember Adam Clymer and what Bush called him? Remember what Clymer wrote that brought on Bush’s blast and Cheney’s “big time” remark? The lone reporter dared report on something negative that Bush had done in the Lone Star State. But Clymer’s truth telling in Texas was so anomalous that Bush attacked him with profanity. The reporter became the story, and the real story--Bush’s poor record in Texas--simply disappeared.

The Clymer incident demonstrated almost unanimous media support for George Bush in every way that truly matters. Similarly, the Naomi Wolf tempest showed the media will sink to the lowest level to blast Democrats.

Republican National Committee operatives sustained their efforts to hammer home the message that Gore was a liar. But the mainstream media not only failed to set the record straight, their megaphone of inaccurate and dishonest reporting reinforced the insidious Republican attacks. So nearly all Americans came to hear that Al Gore said he invented the Internet. And now Americans are hearing lies about John Kerry.

Why Is the American Media an Instrument for Republican Lies?

Most Republican National Committee lies make sensational stories, something the media loves, of course. And most media millionaires want Bush to win, because Bush is good to them. Clear enough, but less clear is how the media billionaires’ print and broadcast employees know exactly how to skillfully serve their bosses without having to be told. It becomes second nature because that is where their primary (economic) interests lie. They don’t have to be told to turn their brains off when the critical reports come in on the Democratic candidate, because it’s automatic.

So the Republican National Committee’s dirty tricks continue with the media reports that John Kerry had a mistress, that he’s a waffling liar, that he was not wounded three times in Vietnam, etc. The media dutifully reports these canards as campaign “news” even though they come straight from the Republicans’ dirty tricks bags. And Americans wonder, did Kerry have a mistress, is Kerry a waffling liar?

What are American Citizens Who Insist on the Truth Supposed to Do about This Injustice?

Every time the media report an inaccurate fact, every time they issue a dishonest report, every time they bend over backwards to smooth over Bush’s foibles and mistakes, every time they go overboard to embarrass Kerry by exaggerating his errors and assassinating his character, scream:

• in letters to the editor
• in faxes and emails to radio and TV station news managers
• to your local and national talk shows

Scream louder and louder until the truth breaks through the Republican National Committee lies and intimidates the complicit media into truth telling. That’s the only way to stop Republican dirty tricks from reaching the living rooms of America. Their lies must be challenged at every stage from now until the November 2nd election. Their lies must be challenged until all the ballots are fairly counted. Their lies must be challenged until John Kerry has become the President of the United States. And then we must continue to challenge their lies. That is what truth telling is all about in America.

Frederick Sweet is Professor of Reproductive Biology in Obstetrics and Gynecology at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis. You can email your comments to Fred@interventionmag.com

interventionmag.com