SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (196305)7/30/2004 1:21:55 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571967
 
JF, Most people thought Clinton would be worse... but like other recent Democrats, he wasn't.

I often criticize the polarized political climate in this country, but in the case of the Clinton administration, six years of partisan gridlock helped a lot in controlling spending. Of course, Clinton gets all the credit.

You could vote for Kerry and bet that a Republican-controlled Congress, stung by a Bush loss, will return to fiscal conservatism. Of course last time, the economy was so strong that partisan gridlock was the best thing for the nation. Not sure that's the case these days.

Besides, you vote in California, and Kerry should easily carry CA. If he doesn't easily carry CA, then all hope is probably lost, so your vote doesn't count for much in the scheme of things.

Well, I hear Ah-nuld will be speaking at the GOP convention. I keep hearing the battle will be for the so-called "swing states," but it's hard for me to think that a state that just recalled a Democrat governor stands no chance of voting for Bush.

Tenchusatsu