SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: freelyhovering who wrote (142116)7/30/2004 5:53:34 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I have not read the Tuchman book, perhaps I will take a look.

I consider it possible that Johnson could not stand being the first president to lose a war, if that were the appropriate characterization. But I consider that a motive "at the margins". It does not, for example, explain why most Congressmen supported the war at the time, or why Americanization of the war was practically unopposed, when Kennedy had been careful to limit our commitment of troops.

Thanks for the consideration<g>......



To: freelyhovering who wrote (142116)8/2/2004 1:18:35 AM
From: Doug R  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Myron,

JFK had signed an executive order to begin withdrawing troops from Viet Nam. Within just a few days after his assassination, that order was reversed by Johnson.

Some interesting reading:

jfkmurdersolved.com

jfkmurdersolved.com