Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: techguerrilla who wrote (39465)	8/1/2004 7:00:21 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 81568

Kerry is ahead in PA by 6-10%. If Bush could win PA he'd knock Kerry out so he spent a ton of time and money there but it looks like Kerry's got that one solid so Bush just wasted a big effort. Since Kerry will certainly take NH, Bush needs to retain every state he won in 2000 and replace NH with another one, like WISC or IOWA. Good luck. Even though polls show those two as toss-ups, Kerry will likely win both. Bush also needs to hang onto Florida and several other former red states where he is now tied or behind. Kerry needs to win all blue states from 2000 plus NH and that's all he needs. He can even lose Florida, Missouri, Arizona, West Virginia and Ohio. Bush has no such luxury. You see, NH was the real difference in 2000. McCain won it for Bush by going tehre at the last minute for him, even though McCain threw up at the event, no doubt because he felt sick helping Bush, the guy whose people slandered his war record.