Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (53349)	8/12/2004 6:28:21 PM
From: Suma	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

I cannot offer you any more evidence that what I have all ready given you. I would imagine that if what was published was untrue that there would be libel suit involved and either the author or publishers would have to pay. Also, NOT all the Arkansas troopers were involved. Just those that were solicited to say what they did... I cannot recall the number. Therefore, I have not called all the Arkansas Troopers liars... Why don't you read the books as I suggested previously when I go around with you and then decide. For me to get the statisitics and facts it would require my getting the book from the reserve in the Library... a long list now and I was the second on it.. and going to the Bibliography and/or footnotes and copying down all the relevant data to prove something to you. I have this feeling,however, that could I come up with the facts as you want them that I still would not be believed. Those who want to disbelieve will continue to do so... So, you will continue to believe what you will and having read two books that for me substantiate that the troopers lied and regretted it afterward will be my truth. You seem to throw out a lot of information on Clinton. What are your sources and how to you prove what you are writing... I don't challenge everyone on their posts but since you raise the issue with me I think from now on I will document and cease just giving my concept from having read something.So though I may be biased I am not being coy as you accused me of being once and I am sure of what I read as I have always disliked it when there have been issues that come up in politics where the nation is prejudiced against someone only to learn later that it was a rumor spread to create dislike and doubt. The same issue is true of Anita Hill... She was discredited falsely. But another story another time.