SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TigerPaw who wrote (198186)8/24/2004 11:00:39 AM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576858
 
"When the statement is not true, then what do you call it?"

The problem here is that Bush can make a credible claim that he didn't know. Available evidence points to him ignoring anything that didn't fit in with his preconceptions. That, and his talent at selective memory, means he arguably didn't know he was, umm, making statements that were at odds with reality.

Now as to the question of whether he should have known...

Because it looks as if all of the evidence was there, and from authoritative sources. Now true, much of it was contradicted by the sources they chose to believe. Apparently, given a choice between ex-patriots who might have an axe to grind, and professional analysts who specialize in the matters in question, go with the axe grinders. They have the common touch.



To: TigerPaw who wrote (198186)8/24/2004 11:17:53 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576858
 
When the statement is not true, then what do you call it?

Bush clearly made "mistakes". Lies require an intent to mislead. As in Michael Moore's movie.

Bush's most famous lie, the one about Yellow Cake in the State of the Union, was specificly pointed out to him as wrong weeks earlier and he removed it from his trial-ballon stump speech.

This has subsequently been proven NOT to have been a lie. Where are you getting your news, the NYT or CNN?