Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kirk © who wrote (66067)	8/26/2004 11:57:51 AM
From: greg s	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

re: suite101.com. Very thinly veiled spam, but spam nonetheless.

To: Kirk © who wrote (66067)	8/26/2004 12:37:42 PM
From: rkral	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

Kirk, re "Clearly Cisco is no Enron ... " Then you shouldn't have made the Cisco-to-Enron and Chambers-to-Lay analogies at the opening of your post. Logically they're known as false analogies, as you belatedly acknowledged. Ron

To: Kirk © who wrote (66067)	8/26/2004 1:52:16 PM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

Kirk, your analysis appears to be missing one key data point: what's the company's total compensation amount compared to other companies. You are focused only on options, yet neglect their lower base pay, which has the net of invalidating your analysis. A valid analysis would include the total company compensation and a comparison. Regards, Amy J