To: mishedlo who wrote (11183 ) 8/31/2004 9:49:35 AM From: zonder Respond to of 116555 This is from another piece he wrote a couple of days ago. Yes, he's been getting very bitter, that guy -g- ------------------------------------------------- Everyone laughs at the Fed and the economists for focusing on the core inflation measures as opposed to the overall indices—of course, food and energy are important, but often reflect more supply than demand factors and what is of paramount importance is whether increases in these two areas filter through into other sectors and also begin to affect inflation expectations—the second-round impact, as we saw in the 1970s, is the real key (today, however, core inflation is 1.8% and total is 3% as opposed to both flirting with doubledigits). But alas, as I walk down the fixed-income trading floor I can still hear the mutterings—"tell Rosenberg that if we excluded everything from last month's CPI, the number would have been flat'". Well, when you've been doing this for 17 years, you develop a pretty thick skin (or you better, if you want to survive in this business). But if truth be told, it isn't just the traditional economists that believe the core is the key, but so do traders and investors! We ran some regressions and found that over the past decade, the statistical correlation between core CPI and the 10-year T-note yield is 58% but the same relationship between total CPI inflation and the 10-year note is only 37%. Not only that, but this gap in terms of relative importance has been widening over time. So take that! ---------------------------------------------- Aww, watch that blood pressure, David :-) I spoke to him a couple of weeks ago. Asked him how come he can't see inflation is rising in the US. He said "I didn't say there is no inflationary trend, but I did say there is no inflationary breakout". We disagreed a bit, but in a much nicer and courteous way than your average SI disagreement - being a client has its advantages -g-