SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Proof that John Kerry is Unfit for Command -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (6600)9/2/2004 6:03:22 PM
From: Richnorth  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27181
 
You are mistaken again!

Clinton did strike at the terrorists in August 1998.

cnn.com

In another report I have read elsewhere, a cruise missile meant for Osama missed him by about 50 yards (or was it 50 ft?) and it did not explode. And superstitious folks thereafter declared Osama to be "zindabad". (That means, long live, invincible). Osama at that time was near a cave entrance.

Shortly after that, Osama sent a fax to his spokesman in London to declare he would be responding with "spectacular" reprisals. The rest is now history which you have asked me to keep quiet about.



To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (6600)9/2/2004 6:11:29 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27181
 
Bush ignored terrorism. Bush took NO ACTION against Al Qaida. Nothing. The USS Cole attack was not long before Bush took over. He did nothing to avenge it at all. He also ignored frequent warnings. Clinton did a lot but not enough. Bush did nothing. Big difference. Kerry also warned both Clinton and Bush about 9-11 style attacks three times in 1999,2000 and 2001. Bush ignored all such warnings. disbanded Clinton's counter-terror desk.