SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (200246)9/4/2004 5:07:56 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1574319
 
He doesn't have to. If it doesn't show the US as the highest taxed, then it is obviously wrong...

The entire argument is flawed; the Left is chronically talking about how the little guys are overtaxed and the big guys are undertaxed. Now, we have this convoluted position that the United States is undertaxed. Yet, we all know that you could confiscate all the earnings of the wealty few who are undertaxed, and still not cover our expenditures.

And we're undertaxed.

The argument is contradictory (illogical) on its face.



To: combjelly who wrote (200246)9/7/2004 4:30:53 AM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574319
 
combjelly,

He doesn't have to. If it doesn't show the US as the highest taxed, then it is obviously wrong...

I think the thread started with Z claiming that we are one of the lowest (second lowest) tax rates in the industrialized world. Why would DR need to show our tax rates are the highest? David is not claiming that.

Joe