Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (67421)	9/6/2004 8:53:16 AM
From: unclewest	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793883

Yes, attacking the civilians of an enemy force occupying the US is terrorism. By whose definition of terrorism? I can think of numerous scenarios where such attacks are not only not terrorism but are permitted under the international laws governing warfare. The biggest problem with the arguments you propose is you have not yet provided your definition of terrorism. Clearly your definition is different than any others. That is why I decided yesterday this conversation is a dead end.