Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Proof that John Kerry is Unfit for Command -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RMF who wrote (10277)	9/17/2004 2:04:00 AM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27181

Iraq is the biggest screw up since Vietnam.

To: RMF who wrote (10277)	9/17/2004 2:13:40 AM
From: Captain Jack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27181

RMF-- I had a couple secretarys during a 30+ year career. Never once was any secretary be privey to my thoughts on anyone and no one had the status of a congressmans son. Under no circumstances would my confidential secretary be aware of much lesser deroggatory THOUGHTS OR FEELINGS. She DID receive FACTS for disipline & etc. Secretarys never knew my personnal thoughts. Also, according to the law, as soon as ANYONE becomes aware of 'personnal notes/memos' they are no longer personnal and may be subpeonaed. Therefore, personnal notes and memos were made by me for me only. They were kept in a secure file at all times. Every manager is aware of this and keeps somethings to themselves to eliminate the possibility of crap surfacing that can bring suite against them. If a mgr believes a subordinate is a slug and makes notes for future reference or action they are kept personnal until needed or destroyed. Yes-- she would know as well ass anybody and no body would know!

To: RMF who wrote (10277)	9/17/2004 3:52:50 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27181

RMF, you are remarkably stupid... what some old woman, an admitted kerry supporter, says about an event 30 years ago is nothing more than ancient hearsay, hardly admissible as credible evidence... in fact, she may be not have any real memory at all about the event but is only conjuring up a story to satisfy the reporter, or herself and her own current political sentiment... witnesses frequently make up stories to satisfy the investigators, it's called experimental bias... do you really believe an undecided voter today is going to make his/her decision in a Presidential election based on an old woman's 30 year old biased gossip? Don't you think you're just grasping for straws? You're entire comment only makes you look completely ridiculous... the woman even said "the documents are fake, but the content is accurate." How can a fake document have anything accurate about it? What kind of twisted logic is that? Isn't she also grasping at straws to save face? Snap out of it already, huh, you're beginning to look as ridiculous as CBS... GZ