Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (204225)	9/28/2004 3:51:47 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576929

re: We had one administration that did not have the guts to do anything, and another one that did have the guts but did not fully succeed. You seem to be spending all your time complaining about the one with guts, and giving a pass to the one with no guts. The US didn't have the political will to go after al Qaeda before 9/11. Clinton or Bush. You know that. But who cares? Clinton isn't president. Bush is the one now attacking the wrong country. re: What about the ones in Guantanamo? Kill them? If they were involved in 9/11, damn right. John

To: Joe NYC who wrote (204225)	9/29/2004 3:41:26 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576929

What about the ones in Guantanamo? Kill them? Well at first hopefully you agree that they should be convicted of some crime, or at least it should be made clear that they are/were a threat to someone. Have you ever heard any of the guidelines that were used to decide which people captured in Afghanistan were sent to Guantanamo, and which were released? I haven't. Without some form of trial or something, and zero explanation as to how it was decided that a captured person in Afghanistan should go to Guantanamo, how do you even know there are any Jihadists there? I'm not saying the proof of their crime/guilt doesn't exist, I'm just saying I have seen zero of it. Have you? Elroy