To: Elroy who wrote (204362 ) 9/30/2004 9:44:39 AM From: i-node Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572295 You seem to have neglected your explanation as to why you think Kerry changes his mind on important issues for political expediency. Do you just take the Bush campaign's word for it? Please provide the changes in Kerry view over the last 20 years that lead you to this conclusion. One need only look at the mess Kerry has made of his position on the War to realize how incompetent the guy is. It is 30 days before the election and the biggest topic before the debate is, "Well, DOES he or DOESN'T he? He did, then he didn't, then he did again, didn't again, and now he doesn't again.". This is no overstatement. Yesterday he actually said, in an interview, "It depends on what the outcome is". YOU WANT THIS GUY AS A PRESIDENT? LMAO.Its precisely the nation building he campaigned against, and flip flopped on for God knows what reason. It really isn't. Nation building wasn't the goal, wasn't the intent, but our guys are there to provide security and the best way to provide security is to help these people get on their feet. You don't actually think 9/11 justified removing Saddam from power more than Iraq, N Korea or the Saudis, do you? It isn't about "justification". I could care less about whether Saddam is part of the problem. His removal is part of the solution, an unrelated issue. North Korea is a problem. But because the Clinton administration allowed NK to get nukes, we are not in a position to do a DAMNED thing about it. Last night, Bush showed his strength in the interview with O'Reilly. When pressed about Iran, he clearly and definitively said we will NOT allow Iran to have nukes. You would NEVER get this kind of gutsy, powerful statement from a Kerry. I can see you're confused about a lot of stuff and you're dead set on voting for the lib. Good luck to you.