Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (12564)	9/30/2004 2:22:29 PM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116555

re-read - relative success - for sure we are better off by not having the Taliban ruling there, or sheltering terrorist training grounds for the sole purpose to attack US interests. It's time to wake up and not be only cynical about every thing. Could Clinton do the same YES would an attack on Afghanistan under Clinton save the US from the horrors of 9/11 very possible Were Al Queda camps in Afghanistan during the Clinton administration ? YES ..... and what about India / Pakistan who talk peace now and who were on the brink of possible nuclear war not so long ago ?