Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sully- who wrote (18124)	10/1/2004 10:26:28 AM
From: JBTFD	Respond to of 90947

repeat post

To: Sully- who wrote (18124)	10/1/2004 10:27:56 AM
From: JBTFD	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 90947

So I guess that explains why there was no second UN rsolution. That and the fact that it was not possible to get one passed. You guys talk about lying. Where are the nuclear weapons? Where are all of the biological and chemical weapons?

To: Sully- who wrote (18124)	10/1/2004 6:55:01 PM
From: JBTFD	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

On this one you are right. I didn't hear the president's speeches. I think many were under the (mis)conception that Bush would do what his father did, get a UN concensus. He didn't. It may be that it wasn't possible to do that. It appears that he didn't even want to try. It also feels like a double standard that we enforce only the resolutions we want to. There are many examples of UN violations and we are not going to war over them. I wonder if we would have gone to Iraq if Saddam hadn't tried to kill Bush sr.