Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (204662)	10/1/2004 11:47:14 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572921

I don't know about all the liberals, but I don't look at only one issue when I trust my vote to someone. Bush is bad on so many issues: The environment, the economy, the separation of religion and state, science, and education. Iraq is just a very visible issue that stinks like a cow patty in the living room. It's clear that Bush and his neocon handlers have to go. The only question left is whether Kerry is an adequate President and the answer is that he is more than adequate, he will be a good leader. TP

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (204662)	10/2/2004 3:57:36 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572921

TP, yes I realize that, but the problem is what to do now. According to you and just about every other liberal on this thread, Iraq is a no-win situation. Why should Kerry continue to pretend otherwise and still receive support from these very liberals? Its sounds like you've given this a lot of thought so why do you think its true that Kerry is "pretending" and that liberals are 'ignoring' that fact? ted

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (204662)	10/3/2004 2:20:38 AM
From: SilentZ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572921

>According to you and just about every other liberal on this thread, Iraq is a no-win situation. Why should Kerry continue to pretend otherwise and still receive support from these very liberals? 1. Iraq isn't the only issue we're voting on. 2. Though I don't give his attempts at multilateralism a great chance of working, I think they've got a better shot than Bush's lack of a strategy. -Z

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (204662)	10/3/2004 5:08:32 AM
From: Elroy	Respond to of 1572921

According to you and just about every other liberal on this thread, Iraq is a no-win situation. Why should Kerry continue to pretend otherwise and still receive support from these very liberals? Well I don't know if I qualify as a liberal (I prefer the term anti-Bush), but my view is not that Iraq is currently a no-win situation. It is a situation that should have been handled MUCH better than it has been for the past 6-9 months, and I assign the responsibility for that poor handling where it belongs - to the Bush administration.