SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: BEEF JERKEY who wrote (636624)10/2/2004 10:03:09 AM
From: Doug R  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
The next debate is going to show shrub's a fidgety, frowning simpleton...just like the first. Maybe his temper will get the better of him and he'll try to take a swing at Kerry.



To: BEEF JERKEY who wrote (636624)10/2/2004 3:27:21 PM
From: Cage Rattler  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
Your point is well taken. I concede to you that Bush did give the appearance of someone in GI distress. And Bush did not say all the right things -- nor did he take advantage of Kerry's foot in mouth statements -- like sending Special Forces into kill UBL (demonstrating Kerry's) profound ignorance of the terrain and culture, continuation of the UN charade of endless toothless resolutions, etc. I doubt that Kerry is ignorant of the facts I allude to but he is taking advantage of that ignorant minority of American voters who couldn't tell Afghanistan from an Afghan.

However, consider if you will Kerry's alleged disclosure of his plan. No useful information was set forth despite spins to the contrary. Plans answer the how’s and what’s define the objectives.

Kerry's "plan" is like me telling you I plan is to have ten million bucks next week, drive a Porsche 930, live in an Italian castle, and lastly convene a consortium (of the willing) consisting of beautiful women to attend my every need. Give me a break.

I want John to tell me how he will get the cooperation of the French, the Germans, the Russians, and the UN -- all of whom have been willing benefactors of the oil for food program -- and not present me with his wish list. His banter of bilateral, trilateral, etc., meetings are not solutions and I refuse to believe that Kerry blowing in Chirac's ear will have the desired influence; I don't know, maybe I'm wrong on that last assumption.

Can we really stand a First Lady like Theresa? Really? Shouldn’t that be the clincher?

:^)