Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrufff who wrote (26647)	10/2/2004 4:25:42 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

<any mainstream candidate would be pretty much where Bush is today, same mistakes, same successes> You've GOT to be kidding! Bush is the ONLY one I know that would set up an office to cherry-pick intelligence in favor of invading Iraq, use it to sell the case, invade a country that wasn't a threat illegally and then blame the quagmire on faulty intelligence! Bush hijacked American sentiment to invade Iraq.

To: rrufff who wrote (26647)	10/4/2004 12:10:40 AM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 173976

My point and we have driven off a different road is that after 9/11, any mainstream candidate would be pretty much where Bush is today, same mistakes, same successes. Bush spent a good percentage of his time clearing brush off the Crawford ranch. THE man with the plan was Paul Wolfowitz. The Man of the Year, Paul Wolfowitz Jerusalem Post, Editor: Bret Stephens fpp.co.uk There's no way that any of the "Presidents" you mentioned would have had Paul Wolfowitz [and Douglas Feith] anywhere near the White House. Without Paul Wolfowitz, Chalabi and his sources would have been nobodies. It would have affected the very content of the Intelligence Estimates. jttmab