Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (205264)	10/6/2004 7:17:32 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574214

And what exactly will be the UN's wrath? It should be the same basic thing that happened in Iraq. 10-12 years of sanctions and penalties, and if the government of the county doesn't reform itself, it should get the Iraq regime change treatment. If the UN is a "world forum", but country A has a dictatorship, who gets to represent country A's population in the world forum? Country A. Of course, but who? My question is who from country A is entitled to sit at the UN and speak for country A if country A has no representative government? Problem with the UN is that it gives an air of legitimacy to too many governemnts that do not represent the will of their people. What is its choice? I don't think you read any of my posts. I'm not talking about the current UN structure, but about how I think it should be structured and what its purpose should be. Elroy