Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Proof that John Kerry is Unfit for Command -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cirrus who wrote (16255)	10/6/2004 8:57:05 PM
From: Ann Corrigan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27181

A vote for Kerry means pandering to the U.N., abolishment of capitol punishment, higher taxes for small businesses, our soldiers would be subject to foreign courts in Kerry's much loved International Criminal Court, rolling back higher standards for public education, no specific plan to address Social Security, pie in the sky tactics to reduce the deficit, but most importantly Kerry's habitual inability to make firm decisions would lead the USA into chaos. After 4yrs the American people would run him out of WashDC and finally convince gullible liberals that a strong, steady leader like GW Bush would have been a much better choice. P.S. A woman's right to choose is not in danger...those who believe it is have fallen for scare tactics from the Left. <<A vote for Bush means pandering to the right with by cluttering up our Constitution with amendments to define marriage, balance the budget (with loopholes), end a woman's right to choose and ban flag burning. Bush has spoken in favor of all.>>

To: cirrus who wrote (16255)	10/6/2004 9:57:41 PM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27181

So much inaccuracy, so little time. liberals believe the constitution should be interperted in ways that expand rights. Conservatives believe that, if the right isn't there in black and white you don't have it. Constructionists interpret the current wind as meaning that whatever they want today should have been in a two hundred year old document. One of the biggest strengths of our government has been that change happens only slowly. Constitutional amendments take years if not decade when they pass at all. A vote for Bush means open season on the environment. Want to drill anywhere, mine anywhere? Need roads through the last of America's virgin wilderness? No problem. A vote for John John is a vote for more money in the hands of Wahabii extremists who view us as infidels to be killed. You claim think Bush is wrong for restoring hat was ok for 200 years until Sick Willy was on his way out the door and desperate for some legacy. Where were you eight years before that? Were you slamming Sick? No! You appear to be duplicitous. The rest, more of the same...