Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bridge Player who wrote (52214)	10/10/2004 12:00:19 AM
From: techguerrilla	Respond to of 81568

Right! Kerry wanted to remove Saddam ..... .......... through international procedures. Kerry would not have invaded Iraq unilaterally. Period. That's all there is to it. What's so difficult to understand about that? The consequences of the decision to invade Iraq unilaterally are now being seen by all of us. Chaos! Amen. Isn't it clear? What chances does Bush have to establish any type of international will to analyze and attempt to resolve the chaos in Iraq? NONE! Kerry will bring clarity of thought to the table for the first time in a few years. /john

To: Bridge Player who wrote (52214)	10/10/2004 9:37:24 AM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

So Bridge Player, what is the intent of your post? We all know what you have posted. You think that we on this thread are debating "whether" Saddam should have been removed or not? We are debating about "how" Saddam should have been removed. Even Clinton said Saddam is dangerous and should be removed. Even Bush Sr. said Saddam is dangerous and Saddam should be removed. So what is your point?