SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (52286)10/10/2004 7:00:54 PM
From: Amy JRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 81568
 
Bush spends $300B/year on war because 3,000 people were killed, meanwhile he's more than happy to let this country's supply of flu vaccine dwindle to half due to a Republican lack of focus on health care. Since we do not have enough flu vaccine for people in nursing homes, this will probably result in the deaths of thousands of people. About 35,000 to 76,000 people are killed annually from the flu.

Someone is spending money in the wrong direction, if the metric of measurement is truly "saving lives." I think even you would agree we need to adjust the budget on how much money goes where, if the metric is saving lives, specifically $300M/year to do this, which is miniscule compared to the whopping war budget of $300B/year.

Amy J



To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (52286)10/10/2004 7:11:47 PM
From: sea_biscuitRespond to of 81568
 
What "there"? If the "there" was Afghanistan, then at least your argument would have some merit. But we have more than ten times the soldiers in Iraq than in Afghanistan. What we have done is to instead of fighting them in Afghanistan, we have decided to create more of them in Iraq. Brain!