SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (76400)10/11/2004 12:37:21 AM
From: kumar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793759
 
If u take the trouble to go back to the 1st reply of mine on this issue, u will notice that I said "in this iinstance, it is possible that the NYT is right". You folks want to extrapolate that to US elections etc, be my guest. Over & out.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (76400)10/11/2004 12:57:58 AM
From: SBHX  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793759
 
Perhaps the article was already written in NYT, and they were waiting for Howard to lose for a more damning article against Bush --- the few more extreme fruitcake fringe of democrats were dancing with glee when Spain's old government lost the election and the new government announced their withdrawal.

But Howard's win - did that change the content of the NYT article? What do you think?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News