SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SBHX who wrote (76859)10/12/2004 12:44:56 PM
From: Lane3  Respond to of 793838
 
Either way, using CR's name for political gains is the untimate callous cold hearted and brazen polical opportunism.

Is there no shame in this?

CR is the one who intentionally put his prominent name out there to call attention to issues vital to those with spinal cord injuries, those who had no voice. Do you really think he would have wanted his name to stop being used upon his death when the impact of it would be the greatest? If we don't use the wishes of the dying as the dominant criterion for what is or isn't shameful, what criterion should we substitute?



To: SBHX who wrote (76859)10/12/2004 2:39:02 PM
From: Rambi  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793838
 
You saw on CNN that he went into a coma ON THURSDAY and that Kerry LIED about being called and thanked by Reeve?

That was the point of my post-- that nowhere on line could I find any mention of Reeve going into a coma on Thurs. By all news accounts he went into a coma on Sat. and Kerry could have received a call.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News