Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (77177)	10/13/2004 2:30:42 PM
From: unclewest	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793797

Doing your duty and going home after fulfilling your military obligation is not quitting. Quitting is what Kerry did on the battlefield.

To: Lane3 who wrote (77177)	10/13/2004 2:45:26 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793797

We're not talking about walking away from the military while legally obligated to serve. That can't be done. We're talking about voluntarily enlisting to serve in the future. To make a commitment to serve for a term of years, knowing that Kerry has voted against US military funding over and over again, that he believes the war in Iraq is the wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time, and that he wants the international community to decide how to deploy the US military in future. Ask Zell Miller. He'll tell you that dog won't hunt. And while we're on the subject, ask yourself whether the US military is likely to come to the aid of France or Germany in any future war. They better hope the Canadians and the Kiwis will come to their aid. Barbra Streisand and Michael Moore can send their kids, mine won't go. I just asked them. They would not volunteer to serve while Kerry or anyone like him is President.