SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (13016)10/14/2004 5:27:38 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20773
 
9/11 report nominated for Hugo Award (*)

Reuters
Thursday October 14, 2004
The Guardian


The account of the September 11 attacks by the US government's 9/11 Commission was nominated for a top US literary award yesterday.

The 567-page 9/11 Commission Report by the bipartisan committee set up by the government became a surprise bestseller with more than a million copies sold, and is now up for the Hugo Award.

The book is one of 20 finalists in four categories for the awards, to be announced on November 17. Winners get a $10,000 (£5,800) prize.

It is only the second time a government report has been nominated. In 1973, New York State's report on the Attica prison uprising was nominated, but did not win.

guardian.co.uk

(*) The Hugo Award was named in honor of Hugo Gernsback, "The Father of Magazine Science Fiction," as he was described in a special award given to him in 1960.

The Hugo Award, also known as the Science Fiction Achievement Award, is given annually by the World Science Fiction Society (WSFS). The distinguishing characteristics of the Hugo Award are that it is sponsored by WSFS, administered by the committee of the World Science Fiction Convention (Worldcon) held that year, and determined by nominations from and a popular vote of the membership of WSFS. In general, a Hugo Award given in a particular year is for work that appeared in the previous calendar year.
[...]

worldcon.org



To: epicure who wrote (13016)10/14/2004 10:39:26 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 20773
 
No, Clinton failed to deal with Saddam. And AQ too. Two big failures.

What you blame Bush for, I give him credit for. It was the right thing to do.



To: epicure who wrote (13016)11/3/2004 3:33:37 AM
From: Kid Rock  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20773
 
GAME OVER

LOL