Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (206594)	10/14/2004 10:12:00 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572692

Dude, the Republicans are using sexuality as a political tool... that's what the anti-gay-marriage amendment is. I don't agree with you, but it is not the moral equivalent of this kind of offensive personal invasion of privacy. That you are supporting Kerry & Edwards' remarks makes you the same kind of hypocrite these jerks are. >> It's a perfectly fair question. The question was fair. It was Kerry's answer that was clearly, obviously inappropriate. >> there is ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY, NOTHING WRONG WITH BEING GAY. Nobody said there is. But Cheney's daughter's private life is no business of Kerry's, and certainly should NEVER have been brought up in the debate, UNLESS Kerry requested and received her prior authorization. This would be analogous to Kerry saying, "I saw old Z out drunk and getting high at the bar last week". Now, Z may have been out drunk at the bar, and he may not have been hiding it, but that doesn't mean he wants to hear it on national TV. You would feel violated. I suspect she does, too.