Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (148001)	10/15/2004 10:46:30 AM
From: GST	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

We have "borrow, borrow borrow" with Bush. We spend what we have on a war to disarm a country without weapons. We cut taxes when we cannot pay our our current year operating costs. Kerry has not spent a dime -- what he will do is classic good financial management -- he will cut the debt, ignite the economy and then finance new programs only to the extent that economic growth permits. You have deluded yourself on who is the crass politician -- it is Bush offering one free lunch after another.

To: michael97123 who wrote (148001)	10/15/2004 11:05:13 AM
From: dumbmoney	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

So i should vote for him in spite of what he says quite clearly about spending and taxes? Should i vote for a guy who attacked greenspan as a partisan who with rubin was architect of the clinton good times? Actually AG isnt my favorite but the american people recognize kerry as the most crass pol in years. And thats because he panders to his left wing often socialist soak the rich, spend spend spend, constituencey . Since the Republicans will almost certainly continue to control the Congress if Kerry wins, I don't know what you're worried about. Divided government results in the excesses of the two parties being canceled out, as we saw during the Clinton years. Gridlock is your best friend in Washington.