Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (206978)	10/16/2004 7:29:17 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574769

You accept the adminstration as just doing the right thing. In the absence of some evidence to the contrary, yes. And there has been none. Was releasing Meshad from Gitmo the right thing?

To: i-node who wrote (206978)	10/17/2004 1:59:38 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574769

There have been no lies, and no disasters. But what, on Earth, does Abu Graib have to do with BUSH? The pitch for war against Iraq was about WMDs, which the adminstration were certain existed, and don't don't. That was either a lie, or a cock up so large that the head guy should be removed from office. The situation in Iraq over the last 6-9 months seems like a disaster. A well run post-major combat operation in Iraq wouldn't look like the past 6 months. What in thew world do you consider a disaster if not insurgents taking over numerouse cities and the coalition having to kill them all to regain control? As for Abu Graib, the buck stops where? Bush is the top dog, so the responsibility for all military action leads back to him. You seem increasingly blind to reality, and have adopted a My Cuontry Right Or Wrong mentality, regardless of the wrongs that confront you every day. David "Head in Sand" Ray