Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (207144)	10/17/2004 11:42:54 AM
From: SilentZ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575288

>Could you please be specific? A link, not only making the allegation, but that has proven to be accurate, would be appropriate to support this claim. Go read Bob Woodward's book or Ron Suskind's book (which cites Paul O'Neill). But you can't, because they're written by "liberals" (people who don't agree with the administration). -Z

To: i-node who wrote (207144)	10/18/2004 2:35:14 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575288

>>> A lot of information has come out over the last year or two showing that this administration pushed the intelligence community to get them the intelligence that they wanted, and that's the intelligence that John Kerry saw. Could you please be specific? A link, not only making the allegation, but that has proven to be accurate, would be appropriate to support this claim. Do you really doubt the above sentence? If not, can you post a single "link" where the Bush adminestration pointed out one scrap of evidence that was the "counter point" to the "Saddam has WMDs" claim? I mean, if you really think the Bush adminstration was just regurgitating the available, relevant intelligence information, there should have been at least some bits or scraps that indicated Saddam didn't have any, right? When did the Bush admistration ever share the counter point intelligence with the public if they weren't filtering the info? Some times you've got take common sense without requiring a "link".