Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (207269)	10/18/2004 10:58:07 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1585691

>>>>>Yes I did - it wasn't his primary job. He's was a little Senator from Massachusettes. The President of the USA was the President of the USA. This is a copout. No it's not, it's a fact. Kerry's responsibility was not diminished by virtue of his position in the Senate. That is an absurd rationalization. Kerry is one of one hundred Senatorial checks on Presidential power. Bush is the leader of the USA. Their responsibilities for leading the nation into war are NOT equal. The analogy (again presented earlier) is a CEO convinces one of 50 department heads on a campaign that drives a corporation into bankruptcy. Both were wrong, but the CEO's responsibility for the mistake is obviously greater than the department head. Kerry had just as much responsibility to do HIS job as Bush did to do HIS. Of course, and their job responsibilties are different. There is a reason one is called the Commander in Chief, and the other is, well, one of 100 Senators. You guys will stop at nothing. Look in the mirror, although your view appears to be so foggy you might want to wait for the shower moisture to clear....